FDA-Required Disclaimer:  Despite the First Amendment, the FDA would prosecute me for expressing my opinion about their criminal harm to public health unless I make the following statements up front:  This page is educational in nature and makes no claims to diagnose, prevent, treat or cure any disease.  All opinions, statements and presentation of facts on this page are my own or those of the people quoted; quotes may have been taken out of context.  You should verify this information through your own research.  If you have any health condition, seek the advice of a doctor who has been awarded the credentials M.D. from an institution financed, approved and controlled by the Medical / Pharmaceutical Cartel, or seek the advice of another health care provider of your choice, whose fees for service are probably not covered by the Health Insurance arm of the Medical / Pharmaceutical Cartel.

Wade Frazier’s Disclaimer [which I am in agreement with]:  I am a layman, and do not give medical advice.  Please do not take my word, or anybody else’s, regarding your health.  Take responsibility for your health, and do not give it to “experts” or anybody else.  Your life is your life, and giving the responsibility for your health to others is a dangerous path.  Talk to your doctor, read this essay, research the areas presented here if you feel so inclined, but in the end, please make your own decisions.  Doctors only know what they are taught, and if they are taught incorrectly, their advice can be less than helpful, and their treatments can kill you.  Please do nothing simply because an “expert” or other authority figure tells you to.


Cancer Patients Are Worth $300,000 to the Cancer Industry


On This Page

  • Cancer is Overdiagnosed and Overtreated
  • Cut, Poison, Burn ~ The Most Dangerous and Least Effective Cancer Treatments
  • Deadly Cancer Drugs Make Cancer Worse
  • Mammograms Cause Cancer ~ Thermograms Safely Detect Breast Cancer Years Earlier
  • Many Doctors Who Prescribe Chemotherapy Would Never Take It Themselves
  • Studies Reveal Chemotherapy Backfires and Causes Faster-Growing Tumors
  • Criminal Corruption of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)


The Corrupt Cancer Industry

There are many vested interests maintaining a deathgrip on the “standard of care”:  pharmaceutical companies that manufacture chemotherapy drugs, medical equipment companies that manufacture radiation treatment machines, medical schools and residency programs that train oncologists, and hospitals that bill insurance companies for surgeries and chemo and radiation treatments.

This industry profit comparison is based on 2006 figures (Fortune magazine, April 30, 2007):

  • Median Annual American Pharmaceutical Company Profits:    20%
  • Median Annual Profits for ALL of the Fortune 500 Companies:  6.3%


Cancer is Overdiagnosed and Overtreated

National Cancer Institute Panel:  Millions Wrongly Treated for Cancer

Dr. Cal Streeter ~ Cancer Diagnostics are “Horrible”


Dr. Richard Schulze ~ People in this country do NOT die of cancer, they die of chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.


Cut, Poison, Burn ~
The Most Dangerous and Least Effective Cancer Treatments


Surgery to remove a tumor does not change the conditions that allowed the tumor to grow in the first place.  Many people who have tumors removed grow new tumors.  If you can make major changes in the conditions in your body that allowed cancer to develop, that can prevent recurrence of cancer, but simple removal of a tumor treats the symptom and not the cause.  Of the three sanctioned treatments, surgery is the least dangerous, but cutting into a tumor can allow cancer cells to spread throughout the body, so surgery is definitely not safe.


Chemotherapy poisons not only cancer cells, but healthy cells as well.  And it too treats the symptom and not the cause, killing existing cancer cells but doing nothing to prevent cancer from recurring.  Some chemotherapy drugs are so toxic that they may cause cancer.  Of the three approved  treatments, this is the most dangerous, as it causes the greatest harm to the immune system, weakening a person’s natural ability to heal from cancer.  There are ONLY three types of cancer that respond to chemotherapy:

  • Testicular Cancer
  • Childhood Leukemia
  • Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma


Radiation is similar to chemotherapy in that it kills both cancer cells and healthy cells, does nothing to prevent recurrence of cancer, and weakens the immune system.  As with chemotherapy, radiation meant to kill cancer cells may also cause cancer.  The radiation from ten years of annual mammograms increases a woman’s chance of developing breast cancer by 33 percent, which indicates that all x-rays, including dental x-rays and airport screening machines, should be avoided as much as possible.


Dr. Peter Glidden ~ Chemotherapy Does Not Work 97% of the Time


Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez ~ The Shocking History of Chemotherapy

Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez on Madame Curie’s Discovery of Radiation Treatment Overshadowing Dr. John Beard’s Discovery of Pancreatic Enzyme Therapy.  Most cancers don’t respond to radiation.  Madame Curie died of radiation exposure.


Theatrical Trailer for the Documentary ~ Cut, Poison, Burn


Jim and Donna Navarro, interviewed by Ty Bollinger, tell the story of their son Thomas, focus of the documentary Cut, Poison, Burn, and describe some of the reforms they feel are necessary in the health care industry.


Cancer is Serious Business
Documentary of the FDA Persecution of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski (Antineoplastons)


The Cancer Conspiracy ~ Part 1 of 2


The Cancer Conspiracty ~ Part 2 of 2


G. Edward Griffin  ~ The Science and Politics of Cancer


Senators and Congressmen Go to Alternative Cancer Clinics for Treatment


Burton Goldberg ~ Biopsies Cause Cancer ~Toxicology studies on surgically removed tumors revealed arsenic, chlordane, DDT, PCBs.  Alcohol intake increases incidence of breast cancer by 2 to 3 times.

Eustace Mullins ~ Murder by Injection:  The Story of the Medical Conspiracy Against America

Ralph W. Moss ~ The Cancer Industry

Ralph W. Moss ~ Questioning Chemotherapy

Ralph W. Moss ~ Customized Cancer Treatment:  How a Powerful Lab Test Predicts Which Drugs Will Work For You — And Which to Avoid.  This is the first book for the layperson on chemosensitivity testing.  This is a laboratory procedure by which patients and their doctors can discover which drugs are most likely to work for them and which to avoid.

Suzanne Somers ~ Knockout:  Interviews with Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer and How To Prevent Getting It in the First Place

Suzanne Somers interviewed on her book Knockout.  Somers tells the story of Farrah Fawcett having chemotherapy without having first had chemosensitivity testing, and then finding from the test that the chemo she was given was not effective for the type of cancer she had.  Somers recommends that anyone confronted with the decision to take chemotherapy insist on a chemosensitivity test to determine which of the drugs, if any, will be effective in treating that particular type of cancer in their particular body.


Deadly Cancer Drugs Make Cancer Worse

Cancer Drugs Lead to Metastasized Tumors


Mammograms Cause Cancer ~
Thermograms Safely Detect Breast Cancer Years Earlier

The radiation from mammograms can cause DNA mutation.  There is new technology available that uses a heat sensitive camera to image physiological activity.  This technology results in color photos which show areas of inflammation, over-active organs, or fast-growing tumor activity as red on a scale from red to blue through the color spectrum.  Some doctors have complained that clinical thermography gives too many false positives.  Think about it this way:  If a thermogram shows a tiny heat spot in the breast tissue, and a mammogram shows nothing in that area, what you are seeing is an indication that if you don’t bring your physiology back into balance, you might eventually develop cancer in that spot.  So rather than consider it as a false positive, it is more accurate to see it as an early-warning alert that you have a pre-cancerous condition, and need to make some changes.

Dr. Moshe Dekel:  Medical Failure and Dangers of Mammography

Dr. Vikki Petersen:  Dangers of Mammograms ~ New Research Findings

Dr. Leonard Coldwell:  Mammograms and Needle Biopsies Cause Cancer

Suzanne Sommers quotes Dr. Russell Blaylock:  Mammograms Cause Cancer

Dr. Russell Blaylock:  The cumulative effect of radiation from mammograms is causing breast cancer.  And if there were already a tumor present, the smashing of breast tissue in a mammogram machine could rupture the tumor and cause the cancer to metastasize.  Dr. Russell Blaylock recommends that the new “gold standard” of cancer screenings should rely on these technologies in this order:

  1. Annual Thermograms for early detection (Thermograms can detect breast cancer 8 to 10 years before Mammograms)
  2. Ultrasound to follow up on any areas of concern detected via Thermogram
  3. MRI to examine any areas of concern detected via Ultrasound

Dr. Christiane Northrup:  Thermograms, The Best Breast Test

International Academy of Clinical Thermology:  Summary of Research Findings

  • An abnormal Thermogram is ten times more significant As a Future Risk Indicator For Breast Cancer Than a First Order Family History of the Disease.
  • Breast thermography has the ability to detect the first signs that a cancer may be forming up to 10 years before any other procedure can detect it.
  • Breast thermography has an average sensitivity and specificity (accuracy) of 90%.

Dr. Len Saputo:  Beyond Mammography

  • Mammography has a false-negative rate of 30%
  • Mammography has a false-positive rate as high as 89%
  • In women under the age of 50…MRIs and PET scans cannot come close to matching the combined sensitivity and specificity (accuracy) of breast thermography.
  • Young women with dense breast tissue are the most difficult to evaluate using breast palpation, mammography, and ultrasound examinations, yet their significantly higher risk of developing breast cancer can be accurately detected with breast thermography.
  • Because of its low cost and high degree of sensitivity and accuracy, all women who want to be screened for breast cancer should begin having breast thermograms beginning at age 25.

Because thermograms can detect breast cancer so many years earlier than mammograms, there is still plenty of time to bring the body back into balance via (1) an anti-cancer diet; (2) a concerted effort to eliminate exposure to toxins in your environment (drinking water, body-care products, household cleaning products, indoor air, etc.), (3) cleansing and detoxing to rid the body of toxins accumulated through a lifetime of unhealthy diet and exposure to environmental toxins, (4) self-healing work focused on resolving emotional traumas that are blocking healthy energy flow, and (5) adoption of other habits of a healthy lifestyle, such as getting enough sunshine, exercise, and sleep.


Most Doctors Who Prescribe Chemotherapy Would Never Take It Themselves

“In 1975, the respected British medical journal Lancet reported on a study which compared the effect on cancer patients of (1) a single chemotherapy, (2) multiple chemotherapy, and (3) no treatment at all.  No treatment ‘proved a significantly better policy for patients’ survival and for quality of remaining life.'”
~ Barry Lynes, The Healing of Cancer – The Cures – the Cover-ups and the Solution Now! – page 9


Dr. Ralph Moss:  Majority of Oncologists Would NOT Take Chemo, But They Prescribe It To Keep Their Jobs


What Doctors Say About Chemotherapy


“Twenty years from now we will look back at chemotherapy and radiation as [being as] barbaric as using leeches.”
~ Steve Millett, Manager of Technology Forecasts for Battelle


Vast Majority of Oncologists Would NOT Use Chemotherapy If They Got Cancer

“A German epidemiologist from the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, Dr Ulrich Abel, has done a comprehensive review and analysis of every major study and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done.  His conclusions should be read by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express.  To make sure he had reviewed everything ever published on chemotherapy, Abel sent letters to over 350 medical centers around the world, asking them to send him anything they had published on the subject.  Abel researched thousands of articles:  it is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more about chemotherapy than he.
“The analysis took him several years, but the results are astounding:  Abel found that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was ‘appalling’ because there was simply no scientific evidence available anywhere that chemotherapy can ‘extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers’.  Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life.  He describes chemotherapy as ‘a scientific wasteland’ and states that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless and is akin to the ’emperor’s new clothes’ – neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works!  (Lancet, 10 August 1991)  No mainstream media even mentioned this comprehensive study:  it was totally buried.”
~ Tim O’Shea, The Doctor Within


“My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated individuals.  If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery …”
~ Prof. Hardin B. Jones. (1956 Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Medical Sciences, vol 6)


Studies Reveal Chemotherapy Backfires and Causes Faster-Growing Tumors

U.S. Scientists Find That Chemotherapy Boosts Cancer Growth


Study Accidentally Exposes Chemotherapy as Fraud - Tumors Grow Faster After Chemo!


Chemotherapy Can Backfire and Stimulate Tumor Growth

Document Approved by the US Patent Office States Radiation and Chemotherapy are Carcinogenic

This statement is included in one of several copycat patents of Dr. Stanislav Burzynski’s anti-neoplastons by his former researcher, Dvorit Samid, and stands as approved in federal government records of the US Patent Office:

“Current approaches to combat cancer rely primarily on the use of chemicals and radiation, which are themselves carcinogenic and may promote recurrences and the development of metastatic disease.”  Source:  US Patent #5,605,930; “Composition and Methods for Treating and Preventing Pathologies Including Cancer”; Filed 3/7/94; Approved 2/25/97; Dr. Dvorit Samid; The USA Dept. of HHS; p. 56.


Criminal Corruption of the National Cancer Institute

  • Failure to fund clinical research trials of effective alternative cancer treatments, thus preventing alternative treatments from attaining FDA approval.
  • Preventing alternative cancer treatments from being presented as treatment options by certified oncologists, who must adhere to the “standard of care” or risk losing their licenses.
  • Further, when the NCI does fund and conduct trials, their practice has been to alter the protocols and let the studies fail to discredit the treatment.

Li-Chuan Chen, PhD, National Cancer Institute Scientist 1991-1997:  “In the past, when the NCI or its assigned entity is conducting an alternative cancer therapy [clinical trial], they always alter the protocols and let it fail to discredit the therapy.  But this time the pharmacokinetic data shows that they didn’t do it right.  And most scientists will not look at it carefully.  Because “Popeye is telling you something, and you don’t question him.”  (Relative to Phase II clinical trials of Dr. Burzynski’s anti-neoplaston treatment in which the medication was so diluted that there was no possibility of a beneficial effect.


Alternative Cancer Treatments

As of 2013, there are over 600 alternative cancer treatments not sanctioned by the AMA.  Many of them cannot be patented because they are based on fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices or other nutrients found in nature.  Treatments that cannot be patented do not make very much money, so there is no incentive to run double-blind clinical trials to document their effectiveness.  In fact, there is a disincentive, because if any of these natural treatments prove effective, they will cut into the profits of Big Pharma.  Therefore, the AMA maintains the position that these treatments are “unproven” and insurance companies will not cover the expense.  Fortunately, many of these treatments are quite affordable compared to sanctioned treatments.  In many cases, the medical / pharmeceutical cartel spends millions of dollars developing an extract of a natural cancer treatment that can be patented.  The patented drug may or may not be more effective than the naturally-occuring substance from which it was derived.

Click here to go to my page on Alternative Cancer Treatments